Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas R. Dye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas R. Dye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas R. Dye more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas R. Dye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas R. Dye. The network helps show where Thomas R. Dye may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas R. Dye
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas R. Dye.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas R. Dye based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas R. Dye. Thomas R. Dye is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dye, Thomas R.. (1990). The Political legitimacy of markets and governments. JAI Press eBooks.8 indexed citations
3.
Dye, Thomas R.. (1990). THE POLICY CONSEQUENCES OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMPETITION. Cato Journal. 10(1).7 indexed citations
4.
Dye, Thomas R.. (1987). THE POLITICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHOICE. Cato Journal. 7(2). 337–344.1 indexed citations
5.
Domhoff, G. William & Thomas R. Dye. (1987). Power elites and organizations. SAGE Publications eBooks.80 indexed citations
6.
Dye, Thomas R.. (1986). Who's running America? : the conservative years. Prentice Hall eBooks.17 indexed citations
7.
Dye, Thomas R.. (1985). Impact of Federal Tax Reform on State-Local Finances. Cato Journal. 5(2). 597–612.1 indexed citations
8.
Dye, Thomas R.. (1983). Who Owns America: Strategic Ownership Positions in Industrial Corporations.. Social Science Quarterly. 64(4).2 indexed citations
9.
Dye, Thomas R. & Julie Strickland. (1982). Women at the Top: A Note on Institutional Leadership.. Social Science Quarterly. 63(2).3 indexed citations
10.
Dye, Thomas R. & Virginia Gray. (1980). The determinants of public policy. Lexington Books.48 indexed citations
11.
Dye, Thomas R., et al.. (1980). Books in review. Society. 17(4). 84–95.1 indexed citations
12.
Dye, Thomas R., et al.. (1979). The Discriminatory Effects of At-Large Elections. Florida State University law review. 7(1). 85–122.6 indexed citations
13.
Dye, Thomas R.. (1979). Who's running America? : The Carter years. Prentice Hall eBooks.6 indexed citations
14.
Dye, Thomas R., et al.. (1978). Reformism and Black Representation on City Councils.. Social Science Quarterly.38 indexed citations
15.
Dye, Thomas R. & Susan A. MacManus. (1976). Predicting City Government Structure. American Journal of Political Science. 20(2). 257–257.30 indexed citations
16.
Dye, Thomas R., et al.. (1969). American Government: theory, structure, and process.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.