Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Sociological Work: Method and Substance.
1971388 citationsIrving Louis Horowitz, Howard S. Beckerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Irving Louis Horowitz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Irving Louis Horowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irving Louis Horowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irving Louis Horowitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Irving Louis Horowitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irving Louis Horowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irving Louis Horowitz. The network helps show where Irving Louis Horowitz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irving Louis Horowitz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irving Louis Horowitz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irving Louis Horowitz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Irving Louis Horowitz. Irving Louis Horowitz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Horowitz, Irving Louis, et al.. (2017). Assassin.1 indexed citations
Horowitz, Irving Louis. (2005). Cultural Contradictions of Contemporary Sociology. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 44(3). 481.1 indexed citations
6.
Horowitz, Irving Louis. (1999). NETWORKING AMERICA: The Cultural Context of the Privacy V. Publicity Debates. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics. 56(3). 305.2 indexed citations
7.
Horowitz, Irving Louis. (1996). Culture, Politics and Mccarthyism: A Retrospective from the Trenches. William Mitchell law review. 22(2). 2.1 indexed citations
Horowitz, Irving Louis. (1986). Communicating ideas : the crisis of publishing in a post-industrial society. Oxford University Press eBooks.12 indexed citations
Horowitz, Irving Louis & Charles W. Mills. (1964). The New Sociology: Essays in Social Science and Social Theory in Honor of C. Wright Mills. Science & Society. 31(1).8 indexed citations
17.
Mills, Charles W. & Irving Louis Horowitz. (1964). Power, Politics and People: The Collected Essays of C. Wright Mills. Science & Society. 28(4).3 indexed citations
18.
Horowitz, Irving Louis. (1962). Crime, Custom and Culture. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 3(2). 229–244.1 indexed citations
Horowitz, Irving Louis. (1961). Radicalism and the revolt against reason : the social theories of Georges Sorel with a translation of his essay on the decomposition of Marxism.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.