Daniel Głód

861 citations
26 papers · 687 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 6
    • Plant tissue culture and regeneration 4
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 7
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research 2

Daniel Głód

26 papers receiving 662 citations

Peers

Daniel Głód
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Biochemistry 198
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 85
  • Plant Science 315
  • Food Science 141
  • Drug Discovery 1
Replace Marcos Taveira with:
Marcos Taveira Portugal
K.M. Maria John South Korea
Faten Medini Tunisia
Anjaneya S. Ravipati Australia
Elaine A. Porter United Kingdom
O. P. Sati India
Sang Suk Kim South Korea
Abdulkarim Sabo Mohammed Malaysia
Alexandra Nerantzaki Greece
Daniel Głód relative to Marcos Taveira Portugal Marcos Taveira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Marcos Taveira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Głód

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Głód's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Głód with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Głód more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Głód

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Głód. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Głód. The network helps show where Daniel Głód may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Głód, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Głód Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Głód links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201468
2 201463
3 201454
4 200352
5 201649
6 201246
7 200742
8 201440
9 201238
10 201435
11 201026
12 200425
13 201024
14 201523
15 201619
16
HPLC of flavanones and chalcones in different species and clones of Salix.
201313
17 201913
18 202112
19 202111
20 20169

About Daniel Głód

Daniel Głód is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Biochemistry, Food Science and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (10 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (7 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (6 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers), Flavonoids in Medical Research (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers) and Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (198 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (85 citations), Plant Science (315 citations), Food Science (141 citations) and Drug Discovery (1 citation). Daniel Głód has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include Mirosława Krauze‐Baranowska, Maria Łuczkiewicz, Magdalena Majdan, Anna Kawiak, Loretta Pobłocka‐Olech, Adam Kokotkiewicz, Rafał Hałasa, Aleksandra Królicka, Izabela Fecka and Yvan Vander Heyden. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Pharmaceutica, Plant Science, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Food & Function and Phytochemical Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact