Dana Krämer
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Neurology top 10%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Signaling Pathways in Disease 3
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 1
- Hereditary Neurological Disorders 1
- Co-authors
- Liliana Minichiello (5 shared papers)Hans Lassmann (1 shared paper)Thorsten Buch (1 shared paper)George Kollias (1 shared paper)Nadine Hövelmeyer (1 shared paper)George Kassiotis (1 shared paper)Zhenyue Hao (1 shared paper)Ning Dai (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cell Metabolism (1 paper)The Journal of Immunology (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dana Krämer
9 papers receiving 410 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Developmental Neuroscience 57
- Neurology 64
- Cancer Research 91
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 70
- Immunology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Krämer
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Krämer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Krämer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Krämer. The network helps show where Dana Krämer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Krämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 142 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 137 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 5 | 1962 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 1 |
About Dana Krämer
Dana Krämer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Signaling Pathways in Disease (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), interferon and immune responses (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper) and Calpain Protease Function and Regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (57 citations), Neurology (64 citations), Cancer Research (91 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (70 citations) and Immunology (70 citations). Dana Krämer has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Liliana Minichiello, Hans Lassmann, Thorsten Buch, George Kollias, Nadine Hövelmeyer, George Kassiotis, Zhenyue Hao, Ning Dai, Friederike Frommer and Ari Waisman. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Metabolism, The Journal of Immunology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications and Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.