Dan Cohn–Sherbok
- Religious studies top 5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 17
- Christian Theology and Mission 2
- Philosophy top 10%
-
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 18
- Religion and Society Interactions 4
- Archeology top 10%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 4
-
- Jewish Identity and Society 8
-
- Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity 4
- Islamic Studies and History 2
- Co-authors
- Andrew LinzeyLouis JacobsChristopher LambChristopher LewisChristopher Alan LewisPeter Cave
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
Dan Cohn–Sherbok
27 papers receiving 79 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Religious studies 35
- Philosophy 20
- Sociology and Political Science 74
- Archeology 15
- Demography 13
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Cohn–Sherbok
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Cohn–Sherbok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Cohn–Sherbok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Cohn–Sherbok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Cohn–Sherbok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Cohn–Sherbok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Cohn–Sherbok. The network helps show where Dan Cohn–Sherbok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Dan Cohn–Sherbok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Politics of Apocalypse: The History and Influence of Christian Zionism | 2006 | 10 |
| 5 | Breve enciclopedia del judaísmo | 2003 | 1 |
| 6 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 7 | The Jewish Messiah | 1997 | 6 |
| 8 | After Noah: Animals and the Liberation of Theology | 1997 | 20 |
| 9 | The Hebrew Bible | 1996 | 11 |
| 10 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 11 | Jewish Mysticism: An Anthology | 1995 | 1 |
| 12 | Иудаизм и христианство : словарь | 1995 | 0 |
| 13 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 15 | The Jewish Faith | 1993 | 1 |
| 16 | A Traditional quest : essays in honour of Louis Jacobs | 1991 | 3 |
| 17 | The Jewish heritage | 1988 | 1 |
| 18 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 2 |
About Dan Cohn–Sherbok
Dan Cohn–Sherbok is a scholar working on Religious studies, Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Archeology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 43 papers that have together received 113 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (18 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (17 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (8 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers) and Islamic Studies and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (35 citations), Philosophy (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (74 citations), Archeology (15 citations) and Demography (13 citations). Dan Cohn–Sherbok has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Linzey, Louis Jacobs, Christopher Lamb, Christopher Lewis, Christopher Alan Lewis and Peter Cave. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, Theology, Scottish Journal of Theology, International Journal of Public Theology and Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.