Scottish Journal of Theology

1.3k papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Scottish Journal of Theology in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Scottish Journal of Theology usually cover Religious studies (685 papers), Sociology and Political Science (411 papers) and Philosophy (402 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (474 papers), Transformation of Global Christianity since 1945 (276 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (197 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scottish Journal of Theology are D. M. MacKinnon, Ernst Bloch, Thomas F. Torrance, David Chester, John M. Hull, Walther Zimmerli, John Webster, Jean Zizioulas, Jean Porter and David F. Ford.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Scottish Journal of Theology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Scottish Journal of Theology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scottish Journal of Theology.

Countries where authors publish in Scottish Journal of Theology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scottish Journal of Theology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scottish Journal of Theology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scottish Journal of Theology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025