Andrew Linzey
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Co-authors
- Tom ReganDan Cohn–SherbokPeter SloterdijkBernard E. RollinTed BentonLori GruenDrucilla CornellMichael J. Thompson
- Topics
- Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (17 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Andrew Linzey
33 papers receiving 231 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Sociology and Political Science 127
- Philosophy 87
- Genetics 67
- Cognitive Neuroscience 57
- Geography, Planning and Development 47
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Linzey
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Linzey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Linzey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Linzey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Linzey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Linzey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Linzey. The network helps show where Andrew Linzey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Linzey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Linzey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Linzey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Linzey. Andrew Linzey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Normalising the unthinkable: the ethics of using animals in research | 6 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Gays And the Future of Anglicanism: Responses To the Windsor Report | 4 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Animal Rights: A Historical Anthology | 18 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | Animal Rites: Liturgies of Animal Care | 3 |
| 14 | C. S. Lewis's theology of animals | 2 |
| 15 | After Noah: Animals and the Liberation of Theology | 20 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Animals and Christianity | 2 |
| 19 | Animals and Christianity: A Book of Readings | 20 |
| 20 | Animal rights: A Christian assessment of man's treatment of animals | 14 |
About Andrew Linzey
Andrew Linzey is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 42 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (17 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (47 citations), Philosophy (87 citations) and Religious studies (31 citations). Andrew Linzey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tom Regan, Dan Cohn–Sherbok, Peter Sloterdijk, Bernard E. Rollin, Ted Benton, Lori Gruen, Drucilla Cornell, Michael J. Thompson, Paola Cavalieri and Julian H. Franklin. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Pharmacology, Theology and Sophia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.