Dan Clawson

3.0k citations
77 papers · 2.0k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Clawson

72 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Dan Clawson
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Public Administration 814
  • Strategy and Management 431
  • Political Science and International Relations 544
  • Gender Studies 212
  • Sociology and Political Science 971
Replace Harry C. Katz with:
Harry C. Katz United States
Sarosh Kuruvilla United States
Kirsten A. Grønbjerg United States
Sanford M. Jacoby United States
Laurence E. Lynn United States
Richard Scase United Kingdom
Paul K. Edwards United Kingdom
Keith Sisson United Kingdom
Paul Blyton United Kingdom
Claus Schnabel Germany
Dan Clawson relative to Harry C. Katz United States Harry C. Katz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Harry C. Katz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Clawson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Clawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Clawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Clawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Clawson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Clawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Clawson. The network helps show where Dan Clawson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Clawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Clawson Line = papers co-authored together Dan Clawson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003239
2 1993225
3 2003193
4 1999182
5 1981106
6 201897
7 201484
8 198978
9 198664
10 200752
11 198850
12 201147
13 198846
14 200143
15 200433
16 198127
17 201526
18 199626
19 200925
20 200024

About Dan Clawson

Dan Clawson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Strategy and Management, having authored 77 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (17 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (8 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (814 citations), Strategy and Management (431 citations), Political Science and International Relations (544 citations), Gender Studies (212 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (971 citations). Dan Clawson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Naomi Gerstel, Mark S. Mizruchi, Alan Neustadtl, Mary Ann Clawson, Paul Goldman, Robert Zussman, Rick Fantasia, John Scott, Verta Taylor and Richard B. Freeman. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Journal of Sociology, Social Forces and Industrial and Labor Relations Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact