D. F. McKenzie
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- History top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gary A. BoormanKeith BleySunita BabbarMichael F. SuarezPeter D. McDonaldBernard LahireMaureen BellB. W. E. Alford
- Topics
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers)Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
D. F. McKenzie
19 papers receiving 451 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Literature and Literary Theory 247
- History 98
- Sociology and Political Science 95
- Anthropology 74
- Sensory Systems 72
Countries citing papers authored by D. F. McKenzie
This map shows the geographic impact of D. F. McKenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. F. McKenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. F. McKenzie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. F. McKenzie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. F. McKenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. F. McKenzie. The network helps show where D. F. McKenzie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. F. McKenzie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. F. McKenzie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. F. McKenzie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. F. McKenzie. D. F. McKenzie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 169 | |
| 4 | The works of William Congreve | 4 |
| 5 | Reducing Attrition Rates for Maori Students | 10 |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | Bibliografía y sociología de los textos | 9 |
| 8 | Making meaning : "Printers of the mind" and other essays | 59 |
| 9 | 316 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | On fact making in empirical studies of literature | 2 |
| 12 | What's past is prologue : The Bibliographical Society and history of the Book | 2 |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | What's Past Is Prologue | 3 |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About D. F. McKenzie
D. F. McKenzie is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Literature and Literary Theory and History, having authored 20 papers that have together received 643 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (247 citations), Sensory Systems (72 citations) and Classics (47 citations). D. F. McKenzie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gary A. Boorman, Keith Bley, Sunita Babbar, Michael F. Suarez, Peter D. McDonald, Bernard Lahire, Maureen Bell, B. W. E. Alford, Robert Hogenraad and Paul Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicologic Pathology, The Economic History Review and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.