Toxicologic Pathology

3.6k papers and 99.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Toxicologic Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 99.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Toxicologic Pathology usually cover Molecular Biology (966 papers), Immunology (676 papers) and Cancer Research (616 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (498 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (441 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (387 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Toxicologic Pathology are Susan A. Elmore, Abraham Nyska, Mark F. Cesta, Ron Kohen, Robert R. Maronpot, Dianne M. Creasy, Gary A. Boorman, Joseph K. Haseman, Charles C. Capen and Brad Bolon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Toxicologic Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Toxicologic Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Toxicologic Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Toxicologic Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Toxicologic Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Toxicologic Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toxicologic Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025