Nick Tomczyk
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Papers in ⓘ
- Spectroscopy 10
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 9
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 5
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 3
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Kevin Giles (4 shared papers)Jakub Ujma (3 shared papers)Todd W. Mitchell (1 shared paper)Stephen J. Blanksby (1 shared paper)Konstantinos Thalassinos (2 shared papers)Berwyck L. J. Poad (1 shared paper)Michael Morris (2 shared papers)Michel Lagarde (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (3 papers)Analytical Chemistry (3 papers)Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (1 paper)Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (1 paper)FEBS Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Nick Tomczyk
12 papers receiving 428 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Spectroscopy 247
- Biochemistry 69
- Nutrition and Dietetics 65
- Molecular Biology 241
- Physiology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Nick Tomczyk
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Tomczyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Tomczyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Tomczyk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Tomczyk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Tomczyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Tomczyk. The network helps show where Nick Tomczyk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Tomczyk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 85 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 76 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 1 |
About Nick Tomczyk
Nick Tomczyk is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Analytical Chemistry, Neurology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper) and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (247 citations), Biochemistry (69 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (65 citations), Molecular Biology (241 citations) and Physiology (45 citations). Nick Tomczyk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Giles, Jakub Ujma, Todd W. Mitchell, Stephen J. Blanksby, Konstantinos Thalassinos, Berwyck L. J. Poad, Michael Morris, Michel Lagarde, Evelyne Véricel and Bernard Fenêt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Analytical Chemistry, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics and FEBS Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.