D. Alomar

442 citations
16 papers · 349 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

D. Alomar

16 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

D. Alomar
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Analytical Chemistry 221
  • Animal Science and Zoology 210
  • Biophysics 50
  • Small Animals 33
  • Equine 6
Replace M. Prevolnik with:
M. Prevolnik Slovenia
Eli Gjerlaug‐Enger Norway
Didier Veselko Belgium
Alessandro Ferragina Italy
V. Toffanin Italy
Virgínia Santos Portugal
R.W. Kranen Netherlands
A. Zachwieja Poland
Hugo Toledo-Alvarado Mexico
Alin Khaliduzzaman Bangladesh
D. Alomar relative to M. Prevolnik Slovenia M. Prevolnik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. Prevolnik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Alomar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Alomar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Alomar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Alomar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Alomar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Alomar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Alomar. The network helps show where D. Alomar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside D. Alomar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Alomar Line = papers co-authored together D. Alomar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2003135
2 201192
3 201229
4 200622
5 201316
6 201214
7 201912
8 20088
9 20176
10 20155
11 20103
12 20153
13
Recuperacion fecal y viabilidad de semillas de tres gramineas forrajeras consumidas por ovinos
19941
14
Excrecion fecal y germinacion de semillas de leguminosas forrajeras consumidas por ovinos
19941
15 20081
16 20041

About D. Alomar

D. Alomar is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Analytical Chemistry, Agronomy and Crop Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Small Animals, having authored 16 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (5 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper), Animal health and immunology (1 paper) and Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (221 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (210 citations), Biophysics (50 citations), Small Animals (33 citations) and Equine (6 citations). D. Alomar has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Peru and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carmen Gallo, M. Jordana Rivero, Ximena Valderrama, Deborah M. Haines, Suzanne M. Hodgkinson, R. Morales, Daniel Cozzolino, Juan Pablo Keim, Óscar Balocchi and Allan Eduardo Wilhelm. Their work appears in journals such as animal, Meat Science, Animal Production Science, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture and Journal of Dairy Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact