Constance McLaughlin Green

426 citations
19 papers · 191 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Constance McLaughlin Green

15 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers

Constance McLaughlin Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Gender Studies 22
  • Space and Planetary Science 3
  • Marketing 20
  • Music 6
  • Sociology and Political Science 79
Replace James W. Silver with:
James W. Silver United States
Edward Buscombe United States
Gary R. Edgerton United States
Maria Łoś Canada
Steve Chibnall United Kingdom
Ruth Bordin United States
Keith Nield United Kingdom
Marisa J. Fuentes United States
Charles W. Akers United States
Dennis C. Dickerson United States
Constance McLaughlin Green relative to James W. Silver United States James W. Silver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James W. Silver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance McLaughlin Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance McLaughlin Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance McLaughlin Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance McLaughlin Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance McLaughlin Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance McLaughlin Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance McLaughlin Green. The network helps show where Constance McLaughlin Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Constance McLaughlin Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance McLaughlin Green Line = papers co-authored together Constance McLaughlin Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 196543
2 196739
3 196720
4 197118
5 196618
6 196212
7
Eli Whitney and the Birth of American Technology
19958
8 19737
9 19706
10 19674
11 19574
12 19643
13 19632
14 19582
15 19742
16 20171
17 19671
18 19681
19 19590

About Constance McLaughlin Green

Constance McLaughlin Green is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Marketing, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (7 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Asian American and Pacific Histories (1 paper), American Literature and Humor Studies (1 paper), Canadian Identity and History (1 paper) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (22 citations), Space and Planetary Science (3 citations), Marketing (20 citations), Music (6 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (79 citations). Constance McLaughlin Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Thernstrom, Robert H. Bremner, Blake McKelvey and John W. Reps. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Southern History, Journal of American History, Geographical Journal and Princeton University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact