Constance J. D’Amato
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Physiology top 2%
- Neurology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Samuel P. HicksRoger L. AlbinJohn B. PenneyAnne B. YoungJ. Timothy GreenamyreA. Byron YoungKaren E. AndersonAnton Reiner
- Topics
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (6 papers)Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers)Neurological diseases and metabolism (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPakistanArmenia
In The Last Decade
Constance J. D’Amato
52 papers receiving 4.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.4k
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Neurology 1.4k
- Physiology 1.0k
- Neurology 670
Countries citing papers authored by Constance J. D’Amato
This map shows the geographic impact of Constance J. D’Amato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance J. D’Amato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance J. D’Amato more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Constance J. D’Amato
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance J. D’Amato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance J. D’Amato. The network helps show where Constance J. D’Amato may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Constance J. D’Amato
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Constance J. D’Amato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Constance J. D’Amato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Constance J. D’Amato. Constance J. D’Amato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 254 | |
| 4 | 179 | |
| 5 | 62 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Differential loss of striatal projection neurons in Huntington disease.breakdown → | 777 |
| 11 | 85 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 73 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 89 | |
| 17 | Neuropathologic alterations in the ataxia (paralytic) mouse. | 28 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | SOME EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON STRUCTURAL AND BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT | 20 |
| 20 | Regeneration and malformation in the nervous system, eye, and mesenchyme of the mammalian embryo after radiation injury. | 54 |
About Constance J. D’Amato
Constance J. D’Amato is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 53 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (6 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (581 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.4k citations) and Neurology (1.4k citations). Constance J. D’Amato has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Armenia. Frequent co-authors include Samuel P. Hicks, Roger L. Albin, John B. Penney, Anne B. Young, J. Timothy Greenamyre, A. Byron Young, Karen E. Anderson, John B. Penney, Anton Reiner and Ira Shoulson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.