Cock Heemskerk

831 total citations
45 papers, 576 citations indexed

About

Cock Heemskerk is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Cock Heemskerk has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 576 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 14 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Cock Heemskerk's work include Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (20 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (12 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers). Cock Heemskerk is often cited by papers focused on Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (20 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (12 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers). Cock Heemskerk collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Germany. Cock Heemskerk's co-authors include H. Boessenkool, David A. Abbink, F.C.T. van der Helm, F.C.T. van der Helm, M. de Baar, D.M.S. Ronden, Stefano Stramigioli, H.J.J. Kals, Martijn S. Visser and Marjolein Visser and has published in prestigious journals such as CIRP Annals, Robotics and Autonomous Systems and Fusion Engineering and Design.

In The Last Decade

Cock Heemskerk

44 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cock Heemskerk Netherlands 12 295 194 123 99 95 45 576
W.S. Kim United States 12 563 1.9× 405 2.1× 90 0.7× 112 1.1× 199 2.1× 22 718
J. Heindl Germany 9 334 1.1× 286 1.5× 40 0.3× 249 2.5× 131 1.4× 19 548
Robert Ambrose United States 12 150 0.5× 218 1.1× 23 0.2× 157 1.6× 185 1.9× 42 566
Eric Huber United States 12 109 0.4× 226 1.2× 45 0.4× 160 1.6× 141 1.5× 29 635
Nadia Figueroa United States 16 125 0.4× 312 1.6× 85 0.7× 63 0.6× 205 2.2× 49 634
Mark Micire United States 11 154 0.5× 100 0.5× 55 0.4× 114 1.2× 56 0.6× 19 433
David St-Onge Canada 12 108 0.4× 103 0.5× 35 0.3× 60 0.6× 59 0.6× 44 323
Antal K. Bejczy United States 11 150 0.5× 207 1.1× 42 0.3× 57 0.6× 92 1.0× 41 371
Robert T. Savely United States 7 103 0.3× 262 1.4× 23 0.2× 97 1.0× 219 2.3× 22 472
Xavi Gratal Sweden 7 151 0.5× 414 2.1× 41 0.3× 79 0.8× 202 2.1× 8 549

Countries citing papers authored by Cock Heemskerk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cock Heemskerk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cock Heemskerk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cock Heemskerk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cock Heemskerk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cock Heemskerk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cock Heemskerk. The network helps show where Cock Heemskerk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cock Heemskerk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cock Heemskerk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cock Heemskerk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cock Heemskerk. Cock Heemskerk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Heemskerk, Cock, et al.. (2024). Augmenting visual feedback with visualized interaction forces in haptic-assisted virtual-reality teleoperation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 11. 1427095–1427095. 1 indexed citations
2.
Wang, Yongliang, et al.. (2024). Self-supervised Learning for Joint Pushing and Grasping Policies in Highly Cluttered Environments. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 13840–13847. 5 indexed citations
3.
Heemskerk, Cock, et al.. (2023). Using modern virtual reality techniques to perform analysis of ITER ECH EL port cell maintenance. Fusion Engineering and Design. 191. 113778–113778. 2 indexed citations
4.
Heemskerk, Cock, et al.. (2021). Design and Evaluation of Haptic Interface Wiggling Method for Remote Commanding of Variable Stiffness Profiles. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 172–179. 4 indexed citations
5.
Heemskerk, Cock, et al.. (2018). Haptic Assistance Improves Tele-Manipulation With Two Asymmetric Slaves. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 12(2). 141–153. 8 indexed citations
6.
Spaeh, P., G. Aiello, R. Chavan, et al.. (2018). Status of the final design of the EC UPP launcher. Fusion Engineering and Design. 136. 1058–1062. 2 indexed citations
7.
Boessenkool, H., et al.. (2017). Where to improve in human-in-the-loop tele-operated maintenance? A phased task analysis based on video data of maintenance at JET. Fusion Engineering and Design. 129. 309–319. 6 indexed citations
8.
Boessenkool, H., et al.. (2017). A task analysis approach to quantify bottlenecks in task completion time of telemanipulated maintenance. Fusion Engineering and Design. 129. 300–308. 6 indexed citations
9.
Pak, S., L. Bertalot, Cock Heemskerk, et al.. (2016). Engineering issues on the diagnostic port integration in ITER upper port 18. Fusion Engineering and Design. 109-111. 824–829. 2 indexed citations
10.
Boessenkool, H., et al.. (2014). Task analysis of human-in-the-loop tele-operated maintenance: What can be learned from JET?. Fusion Engineering and Design. 89(9-10). 2283–2288. 6 indexed citations
11.
Ronden, D.M.S., M. de Baar, R. Chavan, et al.. (2013). The ITER EC H&CD Upper Launcher: Maintenance concepts. Fusion Engineering and Design. 88(9-10). 1982–1986. 4 indexed citations
12.
Abbink, David A., et al.. (2013). The Impact of Haptic Feedback Quality on the Performance of Teleoperated Assembly Tasks. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 6(2). 242–252. 76 indexed citations
13.
Boessenkool, H., et al.. (2012). A Task-Specific Analysis of the Benefit of Haptic Shared Control During Telemanipulation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 6(1). 2–12. 84 indexed citations
14.
Heemskerk, Cock, et al.. (2012). Analysis of ITER upper port plug remote handling maintenance scenarios. Fusion Engineering and Design. 87(5-6). 515–519. 8 indexed citations
15.
Boessenkool, H., David A. Abbink, Cock Heemskerk, & F.C.T. van der Helm. (2011). Haptic shared control improves tele-operated task performance towards performance in direct control. 433–438. 17 indexed citations
16.
Jaspers, R., et al.. (2009). Maintenance implications of critical components in ITER CXRS upper port plug design. Fusion Engineering and Design. 84(7-11). 1091–1094. 11 indexed citations
17.
Heemskerk, Cock, et al.. (2006). Demonstrating the feasibility of ERA Operations from Ground. 1 indexed citations
18.
Visser, Martijn S., Stefano Stramigioli, & Cock Heemskerk. (2003). Screw bondgraph contact dynamics. University of Twente Research Information. 3. 2239–2244. 8 indexed citations
19.
Heemskerk, Cock, et al.. (1990). Grouping Parts to Reduce the Complexity of Assembly Sequence Planning. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 23(3). 233–238. 19 indexed citations
20.
Heemskerk, Cock, et al.. (1988). DATE: a benchmark for flexible assembly systems. Assembly Automation. 8(4). 205–210. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026