G. K. Hunter
Impact in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Classics top 5%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 17
- Historical and Literary Analyses 2
- French Literature and Criticism 1
- Classics 6
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 4
- Co-authors
- Ian DonaldsonEmrys JonesJean RobertsonDouglas L. ColeCraig R. ThompsonM. C. BradbrookR. A. FoakesJohn Steane
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (23 papers)Shakespeare Quarterly (6 papers)Renaissance Drama (3 papers)Notes and Queries (1 paper)The Review of English Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
G. K. Hunter
35 papers receiving 141 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Literature and Literary Theory 210
- Classics 61
- History 112
- Museology 26
- Music 23
Countries citing papers authored by G. K. Hunter
This map shows the geographic impact of G. K. Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. K. Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. K. Hunter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. K. Hunter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. K. Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. K. Hunter. The network helps show where G. K. Hunter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. K. Hunter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Arts of performance in Elizabethan and early Stuart drama : essays for G.K. Hunter | 1991 | 7 |
| 2 | Campaspe/Sappho and Phao | 1991 | 3 |
| 3 | 1983 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1981 | 17 | |
| 6 | Dramatic identities and cultural tradition: Studies in Shakespeare and his contemporaries : critical essays | 1978 | 4 |
| 7 | 1978 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1973 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 0 | |
| 10 | The English Drama 1485-1585 | 1969 | 8 |
| 11 | Antonio's revenge : the second part of Antonio and Mellida | 1965 | 3 |
| 12 | 1964 | 25 | |
| 13 | 1964 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1964 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1964 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1964 | 20 | |
| 18 | 1963 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1963 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 9 |
About G. K. Hunter
G. K. Hunter is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Music, Anthropology and Museology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (17 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (4 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers) and French Literature and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (210 citations), Classics (61 citations), History (112 citations), Museology (26 citations) and Music (23 citations). G. K. Hunter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ian Donaldson, Emrys Jones, Jean Robertson, Douglas L. Cole, Craig R. Thompson, M. C. Bradbrook, R. A. Foakes, John Steane, G. E. Bentley and Aubrey Williams. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Shakespeare Quarterly, Renaissance Drama, Notes and Queries and The Review of English Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.