James Thompson
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Protein Structure and Dynamics 7
- Structural Biology top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Biotechnology top 5%
-
- Enzyme Structure and Function 7
-
- Design Education and Practice 4
-
- Higher Education Practises and Engagement 3
- Reflective Practices in Education 3
-
- Architecture, Art, Education 3
-
- HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment 3
-
- HIV Research and Treatment 3
- Co-authors
- David BakerSrivatsan RamanFrank DiMaioDavid E. KimElmar KriegerJooyoung LeeMike TykaKeehyoung Joo
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James Thompson
52 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Molecular Biology 2.2k
- Structural Biology 36
- Computer Science Applications 90
- Sensory Systems 80
- Biotechnology 127
Countries citing papers authored by James Thompson
This map shows the geographic impact of James Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Thompson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Thompson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Thompson. The network helps show where James Thompson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Thompson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 79 | |
| 9 | High-Resolution Comparative Modeling with RosettaCMbreakdown → | 2013 | 813 |
| 10 | Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game playersbreakdown → | 2011 | 301 |
| 11 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 14 | Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side‐chain accuracy in homology modeling: Four approaches that performed well in CASP8breakdown → | 2009 | 1107 |
| 15 | Structure prediction for CASP8 with all‐atom refinement using Rosettabreakdown → | 2009 | 380 |
| 16 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 145 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 89 | |
| 20 | Space Shuttle Main Engine | 1980 | 6 |
About James Thompson
James Thompson is a scholar working on Architecture, Virology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 61 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (7 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (7 papers), Design Education and Practice (4 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (3 papers), Architecture, Art, Education (3 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (3 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (3 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (2.2k citations), Structural Biology (36 citations) and Computer Science Applications (90 citations). James Thompson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Baker, Srivatsan Raman, Frank DiMaio, David E. Kim, Elmar Krieger, Jooyoung Lee, Mike Tyka, Keehyoung Joo, Jinwoo Lee and Kevin Karplus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.