Maital Neta

3.9k total citations
63 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Maital Neta is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Maital Neta has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 15 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Maital Neta's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (19 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers). Maital Neta is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (19 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers). Maital Neta collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Maital Neta's co-authors include Moshe Bar, Paul J. Whalen, Heather Linz, Steven E. Petersen, F. Caroline Davis, Bradley L. Schlaggar, Catherine J. Norris, M. Justin Kim, Nurit Gronau and Nathan M. Petro and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Maital Neta

60 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Maital Neta United States 25 1.7k 1.1k 823 287 181 63 2.6k
Johannes Hewig Germany 34 2.0k 1.2× 955 0.9× 537 0.7× 566 2.0× 348 1.9× 113 3.1k
Paula M. Niedenthal France 18 1.7k 1.0× 1.3k 1.2× 1.2k 1.4× 262 0.9× 388 2.1× 30 2.8k
Monika Thunberg Sweden 8 1.3k 0.8× 841 0.8× 1.0k 1.3× 242 0.8× 168 0.9× 12 2.1k
Rachael E. Jack United Kingdom 21 1.9k 1.1× 1.6k 1.5× 1.1k 1.3× 197 0.7× 220 1.2× 56 3.1k
Robert D. Melara United States 30 1.9k 1.1× 1.2k 1.1× 448 0.5× 176 0.6× 74 0.4× 78 2.7k
Alexandre Schaefer United Kingdom 24 1.4k 0.8× 878 0.8× 471 0.6× 291 1.0× 102 0.6× 51 2.2k
Sylvie Blairy Belgium 18 1.1k 0.7× 923 0.8× 815 1.0× 380 1.3× 294 1.6× 41 2.2k
Jan W. Van Strien Netherlands 33 1.9k 1.1× 830 0.8× 472 0.6× 370 1.3× 129 0.7× 92 2.7k
Annekathrin Schacht Germany 35 3.1k 1.8× 1.7k 1.5× 877 1.1× 207 0.7× 127 0.7× 84 3.9k
Laura Miccoli Spain 9 891 0.5× 596 0.5× 399 0.5× 198 0.7× 63 0.3× 14 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Maital Neta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maital Neta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maital Neta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maital Neta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maital Neta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maital Neta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maital Neta. The network helps show where Maital Neta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maital Neta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maital Neta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maital Neta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maital Neta. Maital Neta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Neta, Maital, et al.. (2024). Associations of state and chronic loneliness with interpretation bias: The role of internalizing symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 180. 104603–104603. 1 indexed citations
2.
Maerlender, Arthur, et al.. (2024). Concussion-Related Disruptions to Hub Connectivity in the Default Mode Network Are Related to Symptoms and Cognition. Journal of Neurotrauma. 41(5-6). 571–586. 2 indexed citations
4.
Pierce, Jordan E., et al.. (2023). Specialized late cingulo-opercular network activation elucidates the mechanisms underlying decisions about ambiguity. NeuroImage. 279. 120314–120314. 6 indexed citations
5.
Gross, James J., et al.. (2023). The role of trait reappraisal in response to emotional ambiguity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Emotion. 24(4). 935–946. 5 indexed citations
6.
Pierce, Jordan E., et al.. (2022). Task-irrelevant emotional faces impact BOLD responses more for prosaccades than antisaccades in a mixed saccade fMRI task. Neuropsychologia. 177. 108428–108428. 1 indexed citations
7.
Pierce, Jordan E., et al.. (2022). Affective flexibility as a developmental building block of cognitive reappraisal: An fMRI study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 58. 101170–101170. 5 indexed citations
8.
Brock, Rebecca L., et al.. (2022). Interpersonal emotion regulation mitigates the link between trait neuroticism and a more negative valence bias. Personality and Individual Differences. 196. 111726–111726. 13 indexed citations
9.
Pierce, Jordan E., et al.. (2022). Reappraisal-related downregulation of amygdala BOLD activation occurs only during the late trial window. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 22(4). 777–787. 8 indexed citations
10.
Neta, Maital & Rebecca L. Brock. (2021). Social connectedness and negative affect uniquely explain individual differences in response to emotional ambiguity. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 3870–3870. 24 indexed citations
11.
Dworetsky, Ally, Benjamin A. Seitzman, Babatunde Adeyemo, et al.. (2021). Probabilistic mapping of human functional brain networks identifies regions of high group consensus. NeuroImage. 237. 118164–118164. 38 indexed citations
12.
Neta, Maital, et al.. (2019). One step at a time: Physical activity is linked to positive interpretations of ambiguity. PLoS ONE. 14(11). e0225106–e0225106. 9 indexed citations
13.
14.
Neta, Maital, et al.. (2017). The impact of uncertain threat on affective bias: Individual differences in response to ambiguity.. Emotion. 17(8). 1137–1143. 21 indexed citations
15.
Brown, Catherine, Candace M. Raio, & Maital Neta. (2017). Cortisol responses enhance negative valence perception for ambiguous facial expressions. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 15107–15107. 40 indexed citations
16.
Neta, Maital, et al.. (2016). Don’t like what you see? Give it time: Longer reaction times associated with increased positive affect.. Emotion. 16(5). 730–739. 38 indexed citations
17.
Neta, Maital, Francis M. Miezin, Scott M. Nelson, et al.. (2015). Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Error-Related Activity in the Human Brain. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(1). 253–266. 59 indexed citations
18.
Neta, Maital & Paul J. Whalen. (2011). Individual differences in neural activity during a facial expression vs. identity working memory task. NeuroImage. 56(3). 1685–1692. 46 indexed citations
19.
Kim, M. Justin, et al.. (2010). Behind the mask: the influence of mask-type on amygdala response to fearful faces. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 5(4). 363–368. 50 indexed citations
20.
Gronau, Nurit, Maital Neta, & Moshe Bar. (2007). Integrated Contextual Representation for Objects' Identities and Their Locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20(3). 371–388. 84 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026