David Stonehouse

83 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers

David Stonehouse
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 198
  • Research and Theory 17
  • Soil Science 159
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 101
  • Environmental Chemistry 91
Replace Smita Sirohi with:
Smita Sirohi India
S. Rosenzweig United States
Stéphanie Alvarez Netherlands
Sandra Novak France
Bouba Traoré Mali
Camila Bonilla Colombia
J. P. Welsh United Kingdom
Paige Stanley United States
Steve Crimp Australia
Powell Mponela Kenya
David Stonehouse relative to Smita Sirohi India Smita Sirohi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Smita Sirohi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Stonehouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Stonehouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Stonehouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Stonehouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Stonehouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Stonehouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Stonehouse. The network helps show where David Stonehouse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside David Stonehouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Stonehouse Line = papers co-authored together David Stonehouse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199588
2 201740
3 198332
4 199629
5 199724
6 199123
7 199022
8 200122
9 198721
10 199120
11 199619
12 200218
13 199517
14 201715
15 198814
16 199714
17 198811
18 199911
19 198610
20 198410

About David Stonehouse

David Stonehouse is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Soil Science and Education, having authored 91 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (13 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (8 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (6 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (6 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (198 citations), Research and Theory (17 citations), Soil Science (159 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (101 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (91 citations). David Stonehouse has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include J. W. Ketcheson, Stéphan Weise, Clarence J. Swanton, David R. Cléments, D. J. Hume, Ralph B. Brown, B. D. Kay, E. Ann Clark, Martin T. Bohl and Alfons Weersink. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Soil and Tillage Research and International Journal of Play.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact