Christina M. Weaver
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Biophysics top 5%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Susan L. WearnePatrick R. HofJennifer I. LuebkeJohanna L. CriminsW. Brent LindquistDara L. DicksteinAlfredo RodríguezJoseph M. Amatrudo
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Christina M. Weaver
23 papers receiving 514 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 316
- Cognitive Neuroscience 238
- Molecular Biology 103
- Biophysics 87
- Physiology 80
Countries citing papers authored by Christina M. Weaver
This map shows the geographic impact of Christina M. Weaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christina M. Weaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christina M. Weaver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christina M. Weaver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christina M. Weaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christina M. Weaver. The network helps show where Christina M. Weaver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christina M. Weaver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christina M. Weaver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christina M. Weaver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christina M. Weaver. Christina M. Weaver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 81 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 82 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 63 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | Automated morphometry for neural cells | 2 |
About Christina M. Weaver
Christina M. Weaver is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biophysics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (316 citations), Biophysics (87 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (238 citations). Christina M. Weaver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Susan L. Wearne, Patrick R. Hof, Jennifer I. Luebke, Johanna L. Crimins, W. Brent Lindquist, Dara L. Dickstein, Alfredo Rodríguez, Joseph M. Amatrudo, Douglas L. Rosene and Anne B. Rocher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.