Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Dual arm manipulation—A survey
2012392 citationsChristian Smith, Yiannis Karayiannidis et al.Robotics and Autonomous Systemsprofile →
A survey of Behavior Trees in robotics and AI
2022132 citationsMatteo Iovino, Jonathan Styrud et al.Robotics and Autonomous Systemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christian Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christian Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christian Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christian Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christian Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christian Smith. The network helps show where Christian Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christian Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christian Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christian Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christian Smith. Christian Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Iovino, Matteo, et al.. (2022). A survey of Behavior Trees in robotics and AI. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 154. 104096–104096.132 indexed citations breakdown →
Smith, Christian, et al.. (2012). A More Cohesive Summarizer. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 1161–1170.5 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Christian, Henrik Danielsson, & Arne Jönsson. (2012). Cohesion in Automatically Created Summaries.3 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Christian, et al.. (2012). This also affects the context - Errors in extraction based summaries. Language Resources and Evaluation. 173–178.5 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Christian & Arne Jönsson. (2011). Enhancing extraction based summarization with outside word space. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 1062–1070.8 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Christian, et al.. (2010). Towards a Rule Based System for Automatic Simplification of Texts. 17–18.10 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Christian & Henrik I. Christensen. (2009). Robot manipulators. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.2 indexed citations
17.
Jönsson, Arne, et al.. (2008). Using Language Technology to Improve Interaction and Provide Skim Reading Abilities to Audio Information Services. 1289.1 indexed citations
Smith, Christian, et al.. (1980). Model for a deep conduit to the Beowawe geothermal system, Eureka and Lander Counties, Nevada. 4.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.