Immunological Reviews

4.3k papers and 391.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Immunological Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 391.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Immunological Reviews usually cover Immunology (3.4k papers), Molecular Biology (898 papers) and Oncology (563 papers) specifically the topics of T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2.0k papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (1.9k papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (918 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Immunological Reviews are Charles A. Dinarello, Thirumala‐Devi Kanneganti, Arlene H. Sharpe, Shizuo Akira, Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Leonard A. Herzenberg, Jeffrey A. Ledbetter, Alexander Y. Rudensky, Kendall A. Smith and Si Ming Man.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Immunological Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Immunological Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Immunological Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Immunological Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Immunological Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Immunological Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Immunological Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025