Chris Bevan

26 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers

Chris Bevan
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Human-Computer Interaction 120
  • Social Psychology 68
  • Literature and Literary Theory 26
  • Information Systems 51
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 44
Replace Ray Lc with:
Ray Lc Hong Kong
Md. Iftekhar Tanveer United States
Erica Robles United States
Ray J. Hickey United Kingdom
Ioannis Deliyannis Greece
Nadia Mana Italy
Axel Platz Germany
Scott McQuiggan United States
Teresa Chambel Portugal
Alia Amin Netherlands
Chris Bevan relative to Ray Lc Hong Kong Ray Lc's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
Ray Lc · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Bevan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Bevan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Bevan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Bevan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Bevan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Bevan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Bevan. The network helps show where Chris Bevan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Bevan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Bevan Line = papers co-authored together Chris Bevan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201544
2 201933
3 201625
4 201624
5 201421
6 200820
7 202017
8 201312
9 201811
10 200811
11 201911
12 20099
13 20197
14 20096
15 20234
16 20204
17 20073
18 20183
19 20213
20 20202

About Chris Bevan

Chris Bevan is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 26 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (4 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (3 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (120 citations), Social Psychology (68 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations), Information Systems (51 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (44 citations). Chris Bevan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Danaë Stanton Fraser, Kirsten Cater, Eamonn O’Neill, David Philip Green, Sarah V. Stevenage, Harry Farmer, David Green, Tim Kindberg, Oscar Miguel‐Hurtado and Richard Guest. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Pattern Recognition Letters and Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact