Nick Day

26 papers receiving 979 citations

Peers

Nick Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 350
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 134
  • Biochemistry 52
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 247
  • Oncology 210
Replace Yilong Li with:
Yilong Li China
Kevin West United Kingdom
Khalid El Bairi Morocco
Sih‐Han Liao Taiwan
Sun‐Mi Park South Korea
Yoshitaka Sekine Japan
Francesco Turrini Italy
Eileen B. King United States
Ya‐Fang Huang Taiwan
Michiari Okuda Japan
Nick Day relative to Yilong Li China Yilong Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Yilong Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Day. The network helps show where Nick Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Day Line = papers co-authored together Nick Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004214
2 2002154
3 1998105
4 200566
5 200560
6 200854
7 199753
8 199650
9 200549
10 200649
11 200543
12 200841
13 200521
14 200017
15 20049
16 20059
17 20129
18 20107
19 20114
20 19964

About Nick Day

Nick Day is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoestrogen effects and research (5 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (4 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (3 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (2 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (350 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (134 citations), Biochemistry (52 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (247 citations) and Oncology (210 citations). Nick Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kay‐Tee Khaw, Sheila Bingham, Ailsa Welch, Angela A. Mulligan, James I. Taylor, Robert Luben, Nicholas J. Wareham, Yen-Ling Low, Philip B. Grace and Guy Launoy. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, International Journal of Cancer, Breast Cancer Research, Journal of Applied Crystallography and Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact