Chi‐Wei Lin

1.9k citations
69 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Chi‐Wei Lin

63 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Chi‐Wei Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Spectroscopy 525
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 643
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 905
  • Family Practice 23
  • Condensed Matter Physics 90
Replace Wen‐Li Lin with:
Wen‐Li Lin Taiwan
Yajing Zheng China
Thomas J. Johnson United States
John W. Gibson United States
Stephen H. Ashworth United Kingdom
C. Reid Australia
B. G. Vekhter United States
Paolo Volpe Italy
James M. Thomas United Kingdom
David Lo Hong Kong
Chi‐Wei Lin relative to Wen‐Li Lin Taiwan Wen‐Li Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.2×
Wen‐Li Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chi‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi‐Wei Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi‐Wei Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi‐Wei Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi‐Wei Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi‐Wei Lin. The network helps show where Chi‐Wei Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chi‐Wei Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chi‐Wei Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chi‐Wei Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000121
2 1998112
3 199888
4 199787
5 198167
6 199662
7 199862
8 198655
9 199748
10 199747
11 199843
12 201242
13 200341
14 201539
15 199836
16 199636
17 202032
18 199832
19 201631
20 199629

About Chi‐Wei Lin

Chi‐Wei Lin is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (27 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (18 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (17 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (9 papers), Laser Design and Applications (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (525 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (643 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (905 citations), Family Practice (23 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (90 citations). Chi‐Wei Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include S. S. Pei, S. J. Murry, J. R. Meyer, Rui Q. Yang, I. Vurgaftman, W. W. Bewley, S. S. Pei, D. Zhang, C.L. Felix and James D. Harper. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, BMC Medical Education, Electronics Letters, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Women & Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact