Chien-Hsin Wang
About
In The Last Decade
Chien-Hsin Wang
10 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Sociology and Political Science 130
- Social Psychology 75
- Gender Studies 50
- Education 44
- Demography 43
Countries citing papers authored by Chien-Hsin Wang
This map shows the geographic impact of Chien-Hsin Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chien-Hsin Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chien-Hsin Wang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chien-Hsin Wang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chien-Hsin Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chien-Hsin Wang. The network helps show where Chien-Hsin Wang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chien-Hsin Wang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chien-Hsin Wang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chien-Hsin Wang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chien-Hsin Wang. Chien-Hsin Wang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 94 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 8 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.