Chiao‐I Tseng

415 citations
23 papers · 170 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Chiao‐I Tseng

19 papers receiving 157 citations

Peers

Chiao‐I Tseng
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Literature and Literary Theory 86
  • Language and Linguistics 46
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
  • Speech and Hearing 21
  • Human-Computer Interaction 11
Replace Alison Gibbons with:
Alison Gibbons United Kingdom
Terry Royce Australia
Tamás Kiss China
Chantelle Warner United States
L. M. O'Toole United States
Thomas Pavel United States
Parlindungan Pardede Indonesia
Charles Temple United States
Geoffrey Finch Nigeria
William McGinley United States
Chiao‐I Tseng relative to Alison Gibbons United Kingdom Alison Gibbons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alison Gibbons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chiao‐I Tseng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chiao‐I Tseng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chiao‐I Tseng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chiao‐I Tseng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chiao‐I Tseng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chiao‐I Tseng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chiao‐I Tseng. The network helps show where Chiao‐I Tseng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Chiao‐I Tseng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chiao‐I Tseng Line = papers co-authored together Chiao‐I Tseng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201334
2 202124
3 202120
4 201718
5 201312
6 201611
7 201210
8 20128
9 20217
10 20236
11 20135
12 20174
13 20173
14 20222
15 20162
16 20181
17 20251
18 20241
19 20221
20 20250

About Chiao‐I Tseng

Chiao‐I Tseng is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (8 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (5 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (3 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (86 citations), Language and Linguistics (46 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations), Speech and Hearing (21 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (11 citations). Chiao‐I Tseng has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John Bateman, Emilia Djonov, Fei Victor Lim, Jochen Laubrock, Otthein Herzog, Marion Müller, Eric Müller-Budack, Theo van Leeuwen and Ralph Ewerth. Their work appears in journals such as Discourse Context & Media, Social Semiotics, Visual Communication, Semiotica and Adaptation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact