Charles Wallis
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 4
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 4
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
-
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 3
-
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 3
-
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 3
-
- Archaeology and Natural History 2
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 2
- Co-authors
- George W. BrightRichard C. HarrelAlan StrudlerStevan HarnadBrian M. SlatorPaul M. ChurchlandH. H. PatteeWilliam Ramsey
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of ScienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyCognitive Neuroscience
- Journals
- Synthese (2 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)The Southern Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Charles Wallis
12 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- History and Philosophy of Science 69
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 148
- Cognitive Neuroscience 170
- General Decision Sciences 10
- Philosophy 58
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Wallis
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Wallis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Wallis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Wallis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Wallis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Wallis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Wallis. The network helps show where Charles Wallis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Charles Wallis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Additions to the Oklahoma Flora from Cherokee County | 2015 | 0 |
| 2 | Additions to the Oklahoma Flora from the Oklahoma Ozarks | 2015 | 0 |
| 3 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 299 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1967 | 3 |
About Charles Wallis
Charles Wallis is a scholar working on Family Practice, History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (69 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (148 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (170 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations) and Philosophy (58 citations). Charles Wallis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include George W. Bright, Richard C. Harrel, Alan Strudler, Stevan Harnad, Brian M. Slator, Paul M. Churchland, H. H. Pattee, William Ramsey and Michael E. Gorman. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.