William Ramsey
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 6
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 6
- Co-authors
- Michael R. DePaulDavid E. RumelhartStephen P. StichStephen StichAlan StrudlerCharles WallisJohn W. KrakauerStevan Harnad
- Journals
- Synthese (3 papers)American Literature (2 papers)Philosophical Psychology (2 papers)Metaphilosophy (2 papers)Mind & Language (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIreland
In The Last Decade
William Ramsey
28 papers receiving 798 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- History and Philosophy of Science 221
- Philosophy 297
- Cognitive Neuroscience 518
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 268
- General Psychology 14
Countries citing papers authored by William Ramsey
This map shows the geographic impact of William Ramsey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ramsey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ramsey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Ramsey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ramsey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ramsey. The network helps show where William Ramsey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside William Ramsey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 10 | Dunbar's Dixie | 1999 | 0 |
| 11 | Rethinking intuition : the psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry | 1998 | 214 |
| 12 | 1997 | 16 | |
| 13 | Rethinking distributed representation | 1995 | 1 |
| 14 | The compelling ambivalence of Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God | 1994 | 4 |
| 15 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 42 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1979 | 0 |
About William Ramsey
William Ramsey is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 35 papers that have together received 890 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (4 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (221 citations), Philosophy (297 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (518 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (268 citations) and General Psychology (14 citations). William Ramsey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. DePaul, David E. Rumelhart, Stephen P. Stich, Stephen Stich, Alan Strudler, Charles Wallis, John W. Krakauer, Stevan Harnad, Brian M. Slator and Paul M. Churchland. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, American Literature, Philosophical Psychology, Metaphilosophy and Mind & Language.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.