Lieven Decock

577 citations
33 papers · 284 indexed · h-index 9

Lieven Decock

29 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Lieven Decock
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • History and Philosophy of Science 66
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
  • Theoretical Computer Science 6
  • Philosophy 47
  • General Decision Sciences 7
Replace Diana Raffman with:
Diana Raffman United States
Michael Rescorla United States
C. Anthony Anderson United States
C. Wade Savage United States
Charles Wallis United States
Alex Oliver United Kingdom
Peter Pagin Sweden
Daniel C. Dennett
Franz von Kutschera Germany
Francesco Orilia Italy
Lieven Decock relative to Diana Raffman United States Diana Raffman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Diana Raffman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lieven Decock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lieven Decock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lieven Decock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lieven Decock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lieven Decock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lieven Decock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lieven Decock. The network helps show where Lieven Decock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Lieven Decock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lieven Decock Line = papers co-authored together Lieven Decock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20203
2 20186
3 20168
4 201628
5 20141
6
Modelling comparative concepts in conceptual spaces
20133
7 20127
8 201241
9 201150
10 20113
11
Quine's antimentalism in linguistics
20100
12 201045
13 20082
14 20068
15 20044
16 20041
17
A Lakatosian Approach to the Quine-Maddy Debate
20024
18 20022
19
QUINE. Naturalized Epistemology, Perceptual Knowledge and Ontology.
20001
20
Quine on names
19991

About Lieven Decock

Lieven Decock is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Color perception and design (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (66 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations), Philosophy (47 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Lieven Decock has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include Igor Douven, R. D. Dietz, Paul Égré, Yasmina Jraissati, Sylvia Wenmackers, Leon Horsten, Gerben Meynen, B.C. van Beers, Yoichi Motomura and R. Dietz. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série, Topoi, Journal of Applied Logic and Noûs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026