Charles Hallisey
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Co-authors
- S. J. TambiahKenneth I. PargämentMark S. RyeGuy L. BeckElliot N. DorffJames G. WilliamsGopal KrishnaTrevor Ling
- Topics
- Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (6 papers)Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers)Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthAnthropologyReligious studies
- Journals
- The Journal of Asian StudiesJournal of the American Oriental SocietyContributions to Indian Sociology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Charles Hallisey
14 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Sociology and Political Science 214
- Political Science and International Relations 166
- Social Psychology 143
- Clinical Psychology 124
- Anthropology 79
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Hallisey
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Hallisey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Hallisey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Hallisey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Hallisey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Hallisey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Hallisey. The network helps show where Charles Hallisey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Hallisey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Hallisey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Hallisey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Hallisey. Charles Hallisey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | therigatha: poems of the first buddhist women | 9 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Religious perspectives on forgiveness. | 169 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Narrative, Sub-Ethics, and the Moral Life: Some Evidence from Theravāda Buddhism | 27 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 200 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Catalogue of the Hugh Nevill collection of Sinhalese manuscripts in the British Library | 7 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 4 |
About Charles Hallisey
Charles Hallisey is a scholar working on Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (6 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (76 citations), Anthropology (79 citations) and Religious studies (38 citations). Charles Hallisey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include S. J. Tambiah, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Mark S. Rye, Guy L. Beck, Elliot N. Dorff, James G. Williams, Gopal Krishna, Trevor Ling, British Library and Heinz Bechert. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Contributions to Indian Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.