Contributions to Indian Sociology

760 papers and 5.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 760 papers published in Contributions to Indian Sociology in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Contributions to Indian Sociology usually cover Political Science and International Relations (311 papers), Sociology and Political Science (273 papers) and Anthropology (214 papers) specifically the topics of South Asian Studies and Conflicts (187 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (185 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contributions to Indian Sociology are Veena Das, McKim Marriott, A. K. Ramanujan, T. N. Madan, Jonathan Parry, Jonathan Parry, Alpa Shah, Patricia Uberoi, Hamza Alavi and Geert De Neve.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contributions to Indian Sociology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contributions to Indian Sociology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contributions to Indian Sociology.

Countries where authors publish in Contributions to Indian Sociology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contributions to Indian Sociology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contributions to Indian Sociology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contributions to Indian Sociology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025