James G. Williams

402 citations
6 papers · 212 indexed · h-index 5
Topics
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper)Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (1 paper)Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

James G. Williams

5 papers receiving 177 citations

Peers

James G. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Social Psychology 138
  • Clinical Psychology 117
  • Health 72
  • Sociology and Political Science 54
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 22
Replace Andrew Powell with:
Andrew Powell United Kingdom
Edward F. Edinger
Ann Belford Ulanov United States
Linda Mabus Jorgenson United States
Bruce R. Reichenbach United States
J. L. Schellenberg Canada
B. Thomas Gray United States
Caton F. Roberts United States
Jason Winters Canada
Russell E. Palarea United States
James G. Williams relative to Andrew Powell United Kingdom Andrew Powell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Andrew Powell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James G. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James G. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James G. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James G. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James G. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James G. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James G. Williams. The network helps show where James G. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James G. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James G. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James G. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James G. Williams. James G. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Religious perspectives on forgiveness.
169
2 11
3 1
4 22
5
Community psychology and coordination
4
6 5

About James G. Williams

James G. Williams is a scholar working on Classics, Religious studies and History, having authored 6 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (1 paper) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (72 citations), Social Psychology (138 citations) and Clinical Psychology (117 citations). James G. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth I. Pargäment, Mark S. Rye, Guy L. Beck, Elliot N. Dorff, Charles Hallisey, W. K. Hartmann, C. R. Chapman, John Martin and Terence M. Keane. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics and Journal of Biblical Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026