Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization
1976278 citationsFrederick Mathewson Denny, Marshall G. S. HodgsonJournal for the Scientific Study of Religionprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Frederick Mathewson Denny Frederick Mathewson Denny (= 1×)
peers
Aziz Al–Azmeh
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Mathewson Denny
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Mathewson Denny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Mathewson Denny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Mathewson Denny more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Mathewson Denny
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Mathewson Denny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Mathewson Denny. The network helps show where Frederick Mathewson Denny may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Mathewson Denny
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Mathewson Denny.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Mathewson Denny based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Mathewson Denny. Frederick Mathewson Denny is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Denny, Frederick Mathewson, et al.. (2017). Copts in Context: Negotiating Identity, Tradition, and Modernity. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).3 indexed citations
2.
Denny, Frederick Mathewson. (2015). An Introduction to Islam. Medical Entomology and Zoology.14 indexed citations
3.
Pals, Daniel L., Frederick Mathewson Denny, & Robert A. Voeks. (2007). Introduction to the Study of Religion. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 56(11). 2207–2215.4 indexed citations
Corrigan, John D., Frederick Mathewson Denny, Martin S. Jaffee, & Carlos Μ. N. Eire. (1997). Jews, Christians, Muslims: A Comparative Introduction to Monotheistic Religions. Medical Entomology and Zoology.11 indexed citations
Denny, Frederick Mathewson. (1989). Qur'ān Recitation: A Tradition of Oral Performance and Transmission. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.23 indexed citations
14.
Denny, Frederick Mathewson. (1987). Islam and the Muslim Community. Medical Entomology and Zoology.19 indexed citations
15.
Denny, Frederick Mathewson & Rodney L. Taylor. (1985). The Holy Book in comparative perspective. University of South Carolina Press eBooks.24 indexed citations
Denny, Frederick Mathewson & Marshall G. S. Hodgson. (1976). The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 15(2). 205–205.278 indexed citations breakdown →
Denny, Frederick Mathewson, et al.. (1973). The Cambridge History of Islam. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 12(1). 130–130.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.