Charles Cole

1.9k total citations
73 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Charles Cole is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles Cole has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Information Systems, 23 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Charles Cole's work include Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (36 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (14 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (9 papers). Charles Cole is often cited by papers focused on Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (36 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (14 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (9 papers). Charles Cole collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Charles Cole's co-authors include Amanda Spink, Jamshid Beheshti, Andrew Large, Mary J. Waller, Susan Carter, Carol Collier Kuhlthau, Kimiz Dalkir, Bernard J. Jansen, Melvin H. Marx and Jo W. Tombaugh and has published in prestigious journals such as Information Processing & Management, Library & Information Science Research and Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.

In The Last Decade

Charles Cole

67 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Charles Cole Canada 18 534 247 215 201 193 73 1.2k
Allen Foster United Kingdom 13 593 1.1× 199 0.8× 241 1.1× 264 1.3× 245 1.3× 26 1.2k
Katriina Byström Norway 14 789 1.5× 246 1.0× 272 1.3× 455 2.3× 480 2.5× 46 1.6k
Michael S. Nilan United States 11 689 1.3× 315 1.3× 474 2.2× 463 2.3× 232 1.2× 23 1.8k
Jamshid Beheshti Canada 19 632 1.2× 144 0.6× 202 0.9× 113 0.6× 191 1.0× 94 1.4k
Kyung‐Sun Kim United States 20 614 1.1× 218 0.9× 509 2.4× 225 1.1× 428 2.2× 70 1.7k
Sanda Erdelez United States 15 327 0.6× 126 0.5× 294 1.4× 299 1.5× 318 1.6× 80 1.1k
Adeyinka Tella Nigeria 19 390 0.7× 196 0.8× 218 1.0× 301 1.5× 132 0.7× 128 1.6k
Diane Nahl United States 17 302 0.6× 101 0.4× 238 1.1× 136 0.7× 176 0.9× 34 832
Ann Peterson Bishop United States 19 467 0.9× 130 0.5× 322 1.5× 155 0.8× 333 1.7× 78 1.3k
Harry Bruce United States 21 783 1.5× 234 0.9× 230 1.1× 888 4.4× 370 1.9× 51 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Cole. The network helps show where Charles Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Cole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Cole. Charles Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cole, Charles. (2014). Google, tear down this wall to exploratory search!. 40(5). 50–54. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cole, Charles. (2012). Information Need: A Theory Connecting Information Search to Knowledge Formation. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 17 indexed citations
3.
Cole, Charles, et al.. (2011). Collaboration Tools in Virtual Educational Communities : A Case of the Paulo Freire Project for Critical Pedagogy. The New Educational Review. 24(2). 271–280. 1 indexed citations
4.
Cole, Charles, et al.. (2010). An associative index model for the results list based on Vannevar Bush's selection concept. Information Research. 15(3). 3. 1 indexed citations
5.
Spink, Amanda, Charles Cole, & Mary J. Waller. (2008). Multitasking behavior. 42(1). 93–118. 58 indexed citations
6.
Spink, Amanda & Charles Cole. (2007). Information Behavior: A Socio-Cognitive Ability. Evolutionary Psychology. 5(2). 9 indexed citations
7.
Beheshti, Jamshid, et al.. (2006). User search behavior of domain‐specific information retrieval systems: An analysis of the query logs from PsycINFO and ABC‐Clio's Historical Abstracts/America: History and Life. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(9). 1208–1220. 25 indexed citations
8.
Spink, Amanda & Charles Cole. (2005). New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval (The Information Retrieval Series). Springer eBooks. 5 indexed citations
9.
Cole, Charles, et al.. (2005). Putting it together online: Information need identification for the domain novice user. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(7). 684–694. 10 indexed citations
10.
Cole, Charles, et al.. (2005). Investigating the Anomalous States of Knowledge hypothesis in a real‐life problem situation: A study of history and psychology undergraduates seeking information for a course essay. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(14). 1544–1554. 9 indexed citations
11.
Spink, Amanda, et al.. (2004). Sexual Information Seeking on Web Search Engines. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 7(1). 65–72. 14 indexed citations
12.
Spink, Amanda & Charles Cole. (2004). A human information behavior approach to a philosophy of information. Library trends. 52(3). 617–628. 25 indexed citations
13.
Spink, Amanda & Charles Cole. (2004). Introduction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(8). 657–659. 6 indexed citations
14.
Spink, Amanda & Charles Cole. (2001). Information and poverty: information-seeking channels used by African American low-income households. Library & Information Science Research. 23(1). 45–65. 95 indexed citations
15.
Cole, Charles & Carol Collier Kuhlthau. (2000). Information and information seeking of novice versus expert lawyers: how experts add value. 1. 103–115. 20 indexed citations
16.
Cole, Charles. (2000). Interaction with an enabling information retrieval system: Modeling the user's decoding and encoding operations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(5). 417–426. 11 indexed citations
17.
Cole, Charles, et al.. (1999). The false focus in online searching : The particular case of undergraduates seeking information for course assignments in the humanities and social sciences. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 38(3). 267–273. 25 indexed citations
18.
Cole, Charles. (1999). Activity of understanding a problem during interaction with an ?enabling? information retrieval system: Modeling information flow. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(6). 544–552. 14 indexed citations
19.
Cole, Charles, et al.. (1991). Wade-Giles or Hanyu Pinyin:. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 12(2). 105–124. 6 indexed citations
20.
Marx, Melvin H., et al.. (1963). Persistence of nonreinforced responding as a function of the direction of a prior-ordered incentive shift.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 66(6). 542–546. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026