Chan M. Hellman

51 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Chan M. Hellman
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Applied Psychology 281
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 282
  • Clinical Psychology 389
  • Social Psychology 334
  • Leadership and Management 17
Replace Lisa E. Baranik with:
Lisa E. Baranik United States
Julie H. Goldberg United States
Jan A. Feij Netherlands
Peter McIlveen Australia
Gisela Mohr Germany
Mark S. Nagy United States
Evelyne Fouquereau France
Laurence Crevier‐Braud Canada
Maura J. Mills United States
Delia Vîrgă Romania
Chan M. Hellman relative to Lisa E. Baranik United States Lisa E. Baranik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Lisa E. Baranik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chan M. Hellman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chan M. Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chan M. Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chan M. Hellman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chan M. Hellman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chan M. Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chan M. Hellman. The network helps show where Chan M. Hellman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chan M. Hellman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chan M. Hellman Line = papers co-authored together Chan M. Hellman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997299
2 200378
3 201658
4 201255
5 200651
6 201950
7 200940
8
Academic Self-Efficacy: Highlighting the First-Generation Student.
199633
9 200832
10 201630
11 201628
12 201827
13 202026
14 201826
15 202225
16 201925
17 201824
18 201723
19 200421
20 201021

About Chan M. Hellman

Chan M. Hellman is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (21 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (11 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (281 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (282 citations), Clinical Psychology (389 citations), Social Psychology (334 citations) and Leadership and Management (17 citations). Chan M. Hellman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ricky T. Muñoz, Jody A. Worley, Peter Williams, Dale R. Fuqua, Steve Hoppes, Yafit Sulimani‐Aidan, Eran Melkman, Chad V. Johnson, Janice E. Williams and Sarah Passmore. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, Child Indicators Research, Journal of Personality Assessment, Research on Social Work Practice and Traumatology An International Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact