Ronit Roth‐Hanania
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ronit Roth‐Hanania
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ronit Roth‐Hanania. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ronit Roth‐Hanania based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ronit Roth‐Hanania. Ronit Roth‐Hanania is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ronit Roth‐Hanania
12 papers receiving 502 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronit Roth‐Hanania
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronit Roth‐Hanania. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronit Roth‐Hanania. The network helps show where Ronit Roth‐Hanania may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Ronit Roth‐Hanania
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronit Roth‐Hanania's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronit Roth‐Hanania with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronit Roth‐Hanania more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.