Cécile Hanon

904 citations
49 papers · 651 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Cécile Hanon

39 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

Cécile Hanon
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 189
  • Clinical Psychology 139
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Applied Psychology 21
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 72
Replace Sandy J. Lwi with:
Sandy J. Lwi United States
Jessica Calleo United States
Sunny Ho‐Wan Chan Hong Kong
Monte Scott United States
Leslie S. Jordan United States
Elizabeth A. Corsentino United States
Matthias Alexander Reinhard Germany
Cannon Thomas United States
Tara E. McKee United States
Benson S. Ku United States
Cécile Hanon relative to Sandy J. Lwi United States Sandy J. Lwi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sandy J. Lwi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cécile Hanon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cécile Hanon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cécile Hanon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cécile Hanon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cécile Hanon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cécile Hanon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cécile Hanon. The network helps show where Cécile Hanon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cécile Hanon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cécile Hanon Line = papers co-authored together Cécile Hanon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018230
2 201853
3 201947
4 202046
5 202045
6 201638
7 201923
8 201923
9 201916
10 201916
11 202116
12 201915
13 200910
14 20138
15 20207
16 20217
17 20105
18 20195
19 20104
20 20174

About Cécile Hanon

Cécile Hanon is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 49 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health, Medicine and Society (11 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (8 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (189 citations), Clinical Psychology (139 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (72 citations). Cécile Hanon has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Tamás Kurimay, Rutger Jan van der Gaag, Danuta Wasserman, Julian Beezhold, Vincent Camus, Martina Rojnić Kuzman, Frédéric Limosin, Nicolas Hoertel, Andrew D. Brittlebank and Livia Vavrusova. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Journal of Affective Disorders, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and L Encéphale.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact