Monte Scott

613 citations
13 papers · 448 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
    • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
    • Memory Processes and Influences
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
    • Neural dynamics and brain function

Papers in

Monte Scott

11 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Monte Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 155
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 165
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Sensory Systems 28
  • Clinical Psychology 91
Replace Nancy B. Cohn with:
Nancy B. Cohn United States
Richard W. Elwood United States
L. Thomas Kucharski United States
Mohammad Rezaei Iran
Sandy J. Lwi United States
Blake J. Lawrence Australia
Samantha Schubert Australia
B. N. Axelrod United States
Alexandra Martini de Oliveira Brazil
Vesna Radojevic United States
Monte Scott relative to Nancy B. Cohn United States Nancy B. Cohn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Nancy B. Cohn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Monte Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monte Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monte Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monte Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monte Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monte Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monte Scott. The network helps show where Monte Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Monte Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Monte Scott Line = papers co-authored together Monte Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1977139
2 198199
3 198456
4 198354
5 197934
6 202225
7 197824
8 20249
9 19815
10 20212
11 19771
12 20240
13 19840

About Monte Scott

Monte Scott is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (1 paper) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (155 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (165 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations), Sensory Systems (28 citations) and Clinical Psychology (91 citations). Monte Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Erickson, Charles J. Golden, Robert Barnes, Murray A. Raskind, Stephen W. Harkins, Robert Bishop, Christopher D. Tori, Stephen Ruedrich, Tina Baykaner and Andrea M. Russo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Cardiac Failure, Psychiatry Research and Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact