Tamás Kurimay
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Zsolt DemetrovicsAttila SzabóMark D. GriffithsRóbert UrbánBernadette KunWolfgang GäebelGyöngyi KökönyeiAndrea Eisinger
- Topics
- Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers)Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Tamás Kurimay
28 papers receiving 777 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Clinical Psychology 451
- Applied Psychology 218
- Social Psychology 217
- Sociology and Political Science 122
- Psychiatry and Mental health 121
Countries citing papers authored by Tamás Kurimay
This map shows the geographic impact of Tamás Kurimay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamás Kurimay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamás Kurimay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tamás Kurimay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamás Kurimay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamás Kurimay. The network helps show where Tamás Kurimay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tamás Kurimay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tamás Kurimay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tamás Kurimay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tamás Kurimay. Tamás Kurimay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | [Recognition, treatment and prevention of suicide in adulthoode - Guideline]. | 0 |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 104 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | Exercise addiction – the emergence of a new disorder | 12 |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 247 | |
| 18 | Pszichiátriai beteg – a legkiszolgáltatottabb utazó = Psychotic patient: the most helpless traveller | 1 |
| 19 | [Community psychiatry and evidence-based modern psychiatric services]. | 0 |
| 20 | 55 |
About Tamás Kurimay
Tamás Kurimay is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (218 citations), Clinical Psychology (451 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (10 citations). Tamás Kurimay has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Zsolt Demetrovics, Attila Szabó, Mark D. Griffiths, Róbert Urbán, Bernadette Kun, Wolfgang Gäebel, Gyöngyi Kökönyei, Andrea Eisinger, Anna Mägi and Judit Farkas. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Psychology of sport and exercise and Epilepsy & Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.