Hilde Verbeek

151 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Hilde Verbeek
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • General Health Professions 1.7k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 835
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 67
  • Demography 400
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 105
Replace Debra Morgan with:
Debra Morgan Canada
Sandra Zwakhalen Netherlands
Debby L. Gerritsen Netherlands
Alison Phinney Canada
Justine Schneider United Kingdom
Jan Dewing United Kingdom
Pirkko Routasalo Finland
Tanya E. Davison Australia
Kristine Williams United States
Megan E. O’Connell Canada
Hilde Verbeek relative to Debra Morgan Canada Debra Morgan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Debra Morgan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hilde Verbeek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hilde Verbeek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hilde Verbeek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hilde Verbeek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hilde Verbeek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hilde Verbeek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hilde Verbeek. The network helps show where Hilde Verbeek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hilde Verbeek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hilde Verbeek Line = papers co-authored together Hilde Verbeek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008169
2 2020169
3 2016161
4 2013160
5 2013159
6 2014148
7 2016127
8 2010102
9 2012101
10 201491
11 201689
12 201485
13 201671
14 201670
15 201762
16 201960
17 201856
18 201456
19 201454
20 201152

About Hilde Verbeek

Hilde Verbeek is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Demography, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 167 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (75 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (23 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (17 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (10 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (8 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.7k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (835 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (67 citations), Demography (400 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (105 citations). Hilde Verbeek has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Nepal and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Jan P.H. Hamers, Sandra Zwakhalen, Erik van Rossum, Bram de Boer, Ramona Backhaus, Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen, Hanneke C. Beerens, Frans E. S. Tan, Elizabeth Capezuti and Michel H.C. Bleijlevens. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, International Psychogeriatrics, Innovation in Aging, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact