Catherine Stanger

103 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Catherine Stanger
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Clinical Psychology 2.3k
  • Applied Psychology 314
  • General Decision Sciences 104
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 646
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 576
Replace Scott F. Coffey with:
Scott F. Coffey United States
Sharon Dawe Australia
Edwin de Beurs Netherlands
Warren E. Lambert United States
George J. Youssef Australia
Lynn P. Rehm United States
Dustin A. Pardini United States
Randi E. McCabe Canada
Derek Richard Hopko United States
Henry E. Adams United States
Catherine Stanger relative to Scott F. Coffey United States Scott F. Coffey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Scott F. Coffey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Stanger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Stanger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Stanger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Stanger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Stanger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Stanger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Stanger. The network helps show where Catherine Stanger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Stanger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Stanger Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Stanger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989413
2 1993377
3 1989281
4 2004198
5 1995176
6 1997163
7 2005161
8 2011161
9 1992156
10 1995142
11 2006135
12 2009126
13 2004111
14 2004110
15 199887
16 200484
17 199980
18 199279
19 200577
20 201374

About Catherine Stanger

Catherine Stanger is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Epidemiology, having authored 104 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (41 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (19 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (14 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (13 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.3k citations), Applied Psychology (314 citations), General Decision Sciences (104 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (646 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (576 citations). Catherine Stanger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Achenbach, Alan Jeffrey Budney, Michael Lewis, Stephanie H. McConaughy, Margaret Wolan Sullivan, James J. Hudziak, Catherine T. Howell, Jody L. Kamon, Michael B. Lewis and William Copeland. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Journal of Pediatric Psychology and Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact