Scott F. Coffey
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 50
- Child Abuse and Trauma 36
- Migration, Health and Trauma 28
- Resilience and Mental Health 9
- General Decision Sciences top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 9
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 18
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 8
-
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 12
- Co-authors
- Kathleen T. BradyMichael E. SaladinGregory D. GudleskiJulie A. SchumacherJ. Gayle BeckPaul R. StasiewiczAndrew K. LittlefieldBonnie S. Dansky
- Journals
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (5 papers)Current Directions in Psychological Science (1 paper)Addiction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Scott F. Coffey
100 papers receiving 5.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Clinical Psychology 3.8k
- General Decision Sciences 316
- Applied Psychology 693
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 954
- Behavioral Neuroscience 223
Countries citing papers authored by Scott F. Coffey
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott F. Coffey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott F. Coffey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott F. Coffey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott F. Coffey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott F. Coffey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott F. Coffey. The network helps show where Scott F. Coffey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott F. Coffey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 5 | Common Questions About Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Psychiatric Disorders. | 2015 | 12 |
| 6 | Examination of a Short Version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale | 2014 | 1 |
| 7 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 75 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 57 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 110 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 68 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 78 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 155 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 216 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 132 |
About Scott F. Coffey
Scott F. Coffey is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 100 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (50 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (36 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (28 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (12 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (3.8k citations), General Decision Sciences (316 citations) and Applied Psychology (693 citations). Scott F. Coffey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen T. Brady, Michael E. Saladin, Gregory D. Gudleski, Julie A. Schumacher, J. Gayle Beck, Paul R. Stasiewicz, Andrew K. Littlefield, Bonnie S. Dansky, Sandro Galea and Melissa Tracy. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Current Directions in Psychological Science and Addiction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.