Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning
20012.3k citationsBernhard Hommel, Jochen Müsseler et al.Behavioral and Brain Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jochen Müsseler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Müsseler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Müsseler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Müsseler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Müsseler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Müsseler. The network helps show where Jochen Müsseler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jochen Müsseler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jochen Müsseler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jochen Müsseler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jochen Müsseler. Jochen Müsseler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hommel, Bernhard, Jochen Müsseler, Gisa Aschersleben, & Wolfgang Prinz. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework of perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 24(4). 869–937.83 indexed citations
13.
Hommel, Bernhard, Jochen Müsseler, Gisa Aschersleben, & Wolfgang Prinz. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 24(5). 849–878.2302 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Müsseler, Jochen, et al.. (2000). The function disadvantage effect in German: A window to the extraction of sentence structure during reading. Memory & Cognition. 993–1003.1 indexed citations
15.
Vroomen, Jean, et al.. (1999). Ventriloquism and the nature of the unity assumption. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).8 indexed citations
Strohner, Hans, et al.. (1995). Wie man Erbsen und Bücher liest: Zur Interaktion von Syntax und Semantik bei der Ellipsenverarbeitung. Max Planck Digital Library. 160(160). 447–469.1 indexed citations
Rickheit, Gert, Hans Strohner, & Jochen Müsseler. (1987). Modalitätsspezifische Textverarbeitung bei Personen mit unterschiedlichen Kommunikationsschwerpunkten. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie. 19. 65–77.7 indexed citations
20.
Müsseler, Jochen & Dieter Nattkemper. (1986). Visuelle sequentielle Darbietung und "normales" Lesen: Ein Vergleich zweier experimenteller Darbietungsarten. Max Planck Digital Library. 28. 107–119.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.