Cath Ellis

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 739 citations indexed

About

Cath Ellis is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Cath Ellis has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 739 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Safety Research, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Cath Ellis's work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (8 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers). Cath Ellis is often cited by papers focused on Academic integrity and plagiarism (8 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers). Cath Ellis collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Cath Ellis's co-authors include Tracey Bretag, Karen van Haeringen, Rowena Harper, Sonia Saddiqui, Philip M. Newton, Michael Burton, David P. Randall, Kiata Rundle, Alisa Percy and Mark Connolly and has published in prestigious journals such as Studies in Higher Education, British Journal of Educational Technology and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Cath Ellis

16 papers receiving 685 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students

2018 242 citations Tracey Bretag, Rowena Harper et al. Studies in Higher Education profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Cath Ellis Australia	10	496	187	142	81	80	17	739
Rowena Harper Australia	12	488 1.0×	182 1.0×	179 1.3×	39 0.5×	76 0.9×	21	753
Meghan E. Norris Canada	5	81 0.2×	32 0.2×	59 0.4×	29 0.4×	30 0.4×	11	362
Somipam R. Shimray India	6	105 0.2×	53 0.3×	28 0.2×	79 1.0×	281 3.5×	27	562
Abdulrahman M. Al-Zahrani Saudi Arabia	9	35 0.1×	26 0.1×	349 2.5×	125 1.5×	53 0.7×	21	614
Margaret L. Rice United States	8	48 0.1×	35 0.2×	224 1.6×	59 0.7×	18 0.2×	21	359
Elizabeth Lomas United Kingdom	11	113 0.2×	37 0.2×	21 0.1×	12 0.1×	19 0.2×	36	428
Michael Gerlich Switzerland	9	49 0.1×	38 0.2×	28 0.2×	30 0.4×	43 0.5×	27	350
Tijen Tülübaş Türkiye	16	26 0.1×	30 0.2×	193 1.4×	56 0.7×	53 0.7×	36	486
Mariana Buenestado Fernández Spain	7	25 0.1×	40 0.2×	158 1.1×	68 0.8×	55 0.7×	23	338
Ontario S. Wooden United States	6	38 0.1×	19 0.1×	301 2.1×	51 0.6×	35 0.4×	7	501

Countries citing papers authored by Cath Ellis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cath Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cath Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cath Ellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cath Ellis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cath Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cath Ellis. The network helps show where Cath Ellis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cath Ellis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cath Ellis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cath Ellis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cath Ellis. Cath Ellis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Ellis, Cath, et al.. (2024). The educational integrity enforcement pyramid: a new framework for challenging and responding to student cheating. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 49(7). 924–934. 11 indexed citations

Ellis, Cath, Karen van Haeringen, Rowena Harper, et al.. (2019). Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data. Higher Education Research & Development. 39(3). 454–469. 72 indexed citations

Bretag, Tracey, Rowena Harper, Kiata Rundle, et al.. (2019). Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 45(1). 125–139. 33 indexed citations

Bretag, Tracey, Rowena Harper, Michael Burton, et al.. (2018). Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 44(5). 676–691. 97 indexed citations

Bretag, Tracey, Rowena Harper, Michael Burton, et al.. (2018). Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education. 44(11). 1837–1856. 242 indexed citations breakdown →

Harper, Rowena, Tracey Bretag, Cath Ellis, et al.. (2018). Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university staff. Studies in Higher Education. 44(11). 1857–1873. 90 indexed citations

Ellis, Cath, et al.. (2018). The infernal business of contract cheating: understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites. International Journal for Educational Integrity. 14(1). 73 indexed citations

Ellis, Cath, et al.. (2018). Power, rights and play: control of play in school grounds, an action research project from Wales. Education 3-13. 47(6). 627–636. 2 indexed citations

Ellis, Cath. (2013). Broadening the scope and increasing the usefulness of learning analytics: The case for assessment analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology. 44(4). 662–664. 72 indexed citations

10.

Ellis, Cath. (2012). The possessive logic of settler‐invader nations in Olympic ceremonies. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change. 10(2). 105–123. 3 indexed citations

11.

Ellis, Cath. (2012). Streamlining plagiarism detection: The role of electronic assessment management. International Journal for Educational Integrity. 8(2). 10 indexed citations

12.

Ellis, Cath, et al.. (2009). The use of scoring rubrics to assist in the management of increased student assessment choice. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 1 indexed citations

13.

Ellis, Cath, et al.. (2009). Improving Student Assessment Choice Using Blackboard's e-Assessment Tools. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 1 indexed citations

14.

Ellis, Cath, et al.. (2006). Running Race. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 41(2). 181–200. 27 indexed citations

15.

Ellis, Cath. (2004). Helping Yourself: Marlo Morgan and the Fabrication of Indigenous Wisdom. Australian Literary Studies. 4 indexed citations

16.

Ellis, Cath & Alisa Percy. (2000). Building Online Essay Writing Support Tools. Research Online (University of Wollongong).

17.

Ellis, Cath. (1997). Socialist realism in the Australian literary context: With specific reference to the writing of Katharine Susannah Prichard. Journal of Australian Studies. 21(54-55). 38–44. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact