Carla M. Pugh
- Surgery top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Debra A. DaRosaAnne-Lise D. D’AngeloJay B. PrystowskyAlex NagleRichard H. BellShlomi LauferRichard E. ClarkPatricia Youngblood
- Topics
- Surgical Simulation and Training (95 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (56 papers)Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (44 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of SurgeryIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelCanada
In The Last Decade
Carla M. Pugh
166 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Surgery 1.6k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 827
- Biomedical Engineering 566
- Physiology 526
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 440
Countries citing papers authored by Carla M. Pugh
This map shows the geographic impact of Carla M. Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carla M. Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carla M. Pugh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carla M. Pugh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carla M. Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carla M. Pugh. The network helps show where Carla M. Pugh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carla M. Pugh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carla M. Pugh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carla M. Pugh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carla M. Pugh. Carla M. Pugh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Multimodality approach to classifying hand utilization for the clinical breast examination. | 6 |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Carla M. Pugh
Carla M. Pugh is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health Informatics and Surgery, having authored 174 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (95 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (56 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (44 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (145 citations), Health Informatics (80 citations) and Surgery (1.6k citations). Carla M. Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Debra A. DaRosa, Anne-Lise D. D’Angelo, Jay B. Prystowsky, Alex Nagle, Richard H. Bell, Shlomi Laufer, Richard E. Clark, Patricia Youngblood, Rebecca D. Ray and Caprice C. Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Surgery and IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.