Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Efficacy of Pamidronate in Reducing Skeletal Events in Patients with Advanced Multiple Myeloma
1996780 citationsJames R. Berenson, Alan Lichtenstein et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
11 years' follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial
2017688 citationsDavid Cameron, Martine Piccart et al.The Lancetprofile →
13-cis-Retinoic Acid in the Treatment of Oral Leukoplakia
1986633 citationsRichard H. Bell et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard H. Bell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard H. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard H. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard H. Bell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard H. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard H. Bell. The network helps show where Richard H. Bell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard H. Bell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard H. Bell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard H. Bell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard H. Bell. Richard H. Bell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cameron, David, Martine Piccart, Richard D. Gelber, et al.. (2017). 11 years' follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. The Lancet. 389(10075). 1195–1205.688 indexed citations breakdown →
Killingsworth, Richard, Audrey de Nazelle, & Richard H. Bell. (2003). A NEW ROLE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN TRANSPORTATION CREATING AND SUPPORTING COMMUNITY MODELS FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION. 13(1).1 indexed citations
Bell, Richard H., Layton F. Rikkers, & Michael W. Mulholland. (1996). Digestive tract surgery : a text and atlas.12 indexed citations
15.
Berenson, James R., Alan Lichtenstein, Lester Porter, et al.. (1996). Efficacy of Pamidronate in Reducing Skeletal Events in Patients with Advanced Multiple Myeloma. New England Journal of Medicine. 334(8). 488–493.780 indexed citations breakdown →
Bell, Richard H.. (1968). The origin of Islam in its Christian environment : the Gunning lectures, Edinburgh University 1925.1 indexed citations
20.
Bell, Richard H.. (1961). A study of the image of the American character as presented in the selected network television dramas /. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.