Carine Defoort
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Religious studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nicolas StandaertRandall PeerenboomRoger T. AmesYuri PinesSor‐hoon TanEvan ThompsonOwen FlanaganChenyang Li
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (32 papers)Japanese History and Culture (12 papers)Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Carine Defoort
39 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Sociology and Political Science 186
- Cultural Studies 65
- Philosophy 46
- Political Science and International Relations 41
- Religious studies 30
Countries citing papers authored by Carine Defoort
This map shows the geographic impact of Carine Defoort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carine Defoort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carine Defoort more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carine Defoort
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carine Defoort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carine Defoort. The network helps show where Carine Defoort may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carine Defoort
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carine Defoort. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carine Defoort based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carine Defoort. Carine Defoort is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | The Mozi as an Evolving Text: Different Voices in Early Chinese Thought | 13 |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | The Profit that does not Profit: Paradoxes with lì in Early Chinese Texts | 9 |
| 13 | Confucian filial piety: root of morality or source of corruption? | 3 |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | The Growing Scope of jian 兼: Differences between Chapters 14, 15 and 16 of the Mozi | 3 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Mohist and Yangist Blood in Confucian Flesh: The Middle Position of the Guodian Text Tang Yu zhi dao 唐虞之道 | 2 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Area-studies stellen wetenschappen ter discussie | 1 |
| 20 | The Pheasant Cap Master | 2 |
About Carine Defoort
Carine Defoort is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies, having authored 50 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (32 papers), Japanese History and Culture (12 papers) and Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (65 citations), Religious studies (30 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (186 citations). Carine Defoort has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas Standaert, Randall Peerenboom, Roger T. Ames, Yuri Pines, Sor‐hoon Tan, Evan Thompson, Owen Flanagan and Chenyang Li. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, Philosophy East and West and Cultural Dynamics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.