Jane Geaney

488 total citations
16 papers, 185 citations indexed

About

Jane Geaney is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Geaney has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 185 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Communication and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jane Geaney's work include Chinese history and philosophy (13 papers), Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (3 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). Jane Geaney is often cited by papers focused on Chinese history and philosophy (13 papers), Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (3 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). Jane Geaney collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jane Geaney's co-authors include Lisa Raphals, Sarah Allan and Rune Svarverud and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophy East and West, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Journal of Religious Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Jane Geaney

14 papers receiving 129 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Geaney United States 7 142 54 28 23 23 16 185
Richard John Lynn Canada 6 118 0.8× 34 0.6× 17 0.6× 20 0.9× 13 0.6× 25 196
Carine Defoort Belgium 7 186 1.3× 65 1.2× 16 0.6× 41 1.8× 30 1.3× 50 219
Christoph Wulf Germany 8 79 0.6× 18 0.3× 12 0.4× 16 0.7× 15 0.7× 46 192
Erica Fox Brindley United States 9 119 0.8× 23 0.4× 21 0.8× 22 1.0× 11 0.5× 30 156
Chris Fraser Hong Kong 10 169 1.2× 38 0.7× 48 1.7× 25 1.1× 68 3.0× 33 226
Anthony C. Yu United States 6 88 0.6× 42 0.8× 5 0.2× 15 0.7× 11 0.5× 36 143
Irene Bloom United States 7 86 0.6× 26 0.5× 22 0.8× 25 1.1× 15 0.7× 18 128
John C. Maraldo Ireland 7 88 0.6× 50 0.9× 7 0.3× 25 1.1× 14 0.6× 24 171
Bo Mou United States 7 80 0.6× 13 0.2× 14 0.5× 23 1.0× 41 1.8× 43 174
Stephen F. Teiser United States 7 152 1.1× 63 1.2× 12 0.4× 25 1.1× 43 1.9× 18 186

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Geaney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Geaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Geaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Geaney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Geaney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Geaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Geaney. The network helps show where Jane Geaney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Geaney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Geaney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Geaney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Geaney. Jane Geaney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
2.
Geaney, Jane. (2018). Language as Bodily Practice in Early China: A Chinese Grammatology. 5 indexed citations
3.
Geaney, Jane. (2018). Language as Bodily Practice in Early China. State University of New York Press eBooks.
4.
Geaney, Jane. (2018). Language as Bodily Practice in Early China. SUNY Press eBooks. 3 indexed citations
5.
Geaney, Jane. (2012). Self as Container? Metaphors We Lose By in Understanding Early Chinese Texts. 5. 11. 2 indexed citations
6.
Geaney, Jane. (2011). Self as Container? Metaphors We Lose By in Understanding Early China. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 1 indexed citations
7.
Geaney, Jane. (2010). Grounding "Language" in the Senses: What the Eyes and Ears Reveal about Ming 名 (Names) in Early Chinese Texts. Philosophy East and West. 60(2). 251–293. 4 indexed citations
8.
Geaney, Jane. (2004). Guarding Moral Boundaries: Shame in Early Confucianism. Philosophy East and West. 54(2). 113–142. 23 indexed citations
9.
Geaney, Jane & Rune Svarverud. (2003). Methods of the Way: Early Chinese Ethical Thought. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 123(2). 409–409. 10 indexed citations
10.
Geaney, Jane. (2002). On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. University of Hawaii Press eBooks. 45 indexed citations
11.
Geaney, Jane. (2000). Chinese Cosmology and Recent Studies in Confucian Ethics: A Review Essay. Journal of Religious Ethics. 28(3). 451–470. 2 indexed citations
12.
Geaney, Jane & Lisa Raphals. (2000). Sharing the Light: Representations of Women and Virtue in Early China. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 120(1). 140–140. 57 indexed citations
13.
Geaney, Jane & Sarah Allan. (2000). The Way of Water and Sprouts of Virtue. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 120(2). 304–304. 14 indexed citations
14.
Geaney, Jane. (1999). A Critique of A. C. Graham's Reconstruction of the "Neo-Mohist Canons". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 119(1). 1–1. 11 indexed citations
15.
Geaney, Jane, et al.. (1999). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 119(2). 366–366. 7 indexed citations
16.
Geaney, Jane. (1998). Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. John Makeham. The Journal of Religion. 78(1). 153–155.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026