C. Christine Bow-Thomas
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Statistics and Probability top 0.5%
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- David C. GearyAlexander L. MillerLiu FanDawn I. VelliganRobert S. SieglerRoderick K. MahurinLinda C. HalgunsethJanice Ritch
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistics and ProbabilityPsychiatry and Mental healthDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
C. Christine Bow-Thomas
18 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Psychiatry and Mental health 727
- Statistics and Probability 556
- Education 475
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 405
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 337
Countries citing papers authored by C. Christine Bow-Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Christine Bow-Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Christine Bow-Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Christine Bow-Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Christine Bow-Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Christine Bow-Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Christine Bow-Thomas. The network helps show where C. Christine Bow-Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Christine Bow-Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Christine Bow-Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Christine Bow-Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Christine Bow-Thomas. C. Christine Bow-Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | |
| 2 | 71 | |
| 3 | 78 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 154 | |
| 6 | 203 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 95 | |
| 9 | 87 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 128 | |
| 14 | 159 | |
| 15 | 94 | |
| 16 | 101 | |
| 17 | 204 | |
| 18 | 64 |
About C. Christine Bow-Thomas
C. Christine Bow-Thomas is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Statistics and Probability, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (556 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (727 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (405 citations). C. Christine Bow-Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include David C. Geary, Alexander L. Miller, Liu Fan, Dawn I. Velligan, Robert S. Siegler, Roderick K. Mahurin, Linda C. Halgunseth, Robert S. Siegler, Janice Ritch and Thomas J. Prihoda. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Child Development and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.